History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hadley v. Massachusetts
18 L. Ed. 2d 1323
| SCOTUS | 1967
|
Check Treatment
388 U.S. 464 (1967)

HADLEY
v.
MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 1179, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 12, 1967.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.

Louis M. Nordlinger for appellant.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Willie J. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for further consideration in light of Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent and would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE CLARK'S dissenting opinion in Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U. S., at 546.

Case Details

Case Name: Hadley v. Massachusetts
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 12, 1967
Citation: 18 L. Ed. 2d 1323
Docket Number: 1179 M
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.