Nos. 4D99-2486, 4D00-201 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Aug 23, 2000

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing and withdraw the opinion issued on July 5, 2000 and substitute the following:

We sua sponte consolidate case numbers 4D99-2486 and 4D00-201. In case number 4D00-201, we affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for burglary of a structure and second degree grand theft.

In case number 4D99-2486, we accept the state’s concession that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on his conviction for trafficking in hydrocodone and hold that *256the trial court should have entered a judgment of conviction for possession on this count. We also hold that the trial court should have entered a judgment of conviction for possession on the charge of trafficking in hydromorphone. See Hayes v. State, 750 So. 2d 1" court="Fla." date_filed="1999-10-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/hayes-v-state-1856114?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1856114">750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999); Travis v. State, 754 So. 2d 59" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="2000-02-25" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/travis-v-state-1133484?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1133484">754 So.2d 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). We certify conflict with Eagle v. State, 772 So. 2d 1" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." date_filed="2000-07-07" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/eagle-v-state-1833624?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1833624">772 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s convictions and sentences for trafficking in hydrocodone and hydromorphone and remand with instructions for the trial court to enter a judgment of conviction for possession on each count and to re-sentence appellant on these convictions.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

DELL, SHAHOOD, and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.