History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hackett v. Shaw
24 R.I. 29
R.I.
1902
Check Treatment

Cases in which new trials have been granted by this court for inadequacy of damages have been those where there was no question as to the extent of the injury. Gartner v. Saxon, 19 R.I. 461;McNeil v. Lyons, 20 R.I. 672. Where there has been a conflict of testimony as to the extent of the injury a new trial has been denied, because the court could not say that the verdict did not represent the *Page 30 honest judgment of the jury upon the conflicting testimony,McGowan v. Interstate Co., 20 R.I. 264.

In this case there was conflicting testimony as to the extent of the injury, and the jury may have believed the testimony for the defence; and, if so, we cannot say that the verdict was clearly wrong.

Petition for new trial denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Hackett v. Shaw
Court Name: Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Date Published: Mar 14, 1902
Citation: 24 R.I. 29
Court Abbreviation: R.I.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.