History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haberfeld v. Mayer
100 A. 587
Pa.
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

This was a feigned issue to determine whether the plaintiff or defendant in it was entitled to the proceeds of a life insurance policy paid into court by the insurance company which had issued it. The jury were directed to find for the plaintiff, and properly so for the reasons appearing in the opinion of the learned court below overruling the motions for a new trial and for judgment non obstante veredicto.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Haberfeld v. Mayer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 8, 1917
Citation: 100 A. 587
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 75
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.