69 So. 894 | Ala. | 1915
The pleadings in this case embracing 15 special pleas, 36 special replications, and several hundred grounds of demurrer, are too multifarious to be considered in detail, and, in view of the simplicity of the. evidence, were wholly unnecessary for a fair and orderly presentation of the issues involved. We have analyzed and classified these pleadings with patient care, and we are clear in the conclusion that, whether there was or was not error in any of the various rulings of the trial judge Avith respect to- them, nevertheless, as the material issues were actually tried, there was no error as to the pleadings Avhicli was at all prejudicial tO' the appellant,
The giving and refusal of instructions by the trial judge were in harmony with the principles and conclusions expressed in the foregoing -opinion; and, there being no error in the record prejudicial to the appellant, the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.