History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haag v. Deter
167 Ind. 126
Ind.
1906
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

In the court below appellee recovered a joint judgment against appellant and one Enyart, and from *127said judgment appellant seeks to prosecute a vacation appeal. Notice has been served on Enyart, but he has not been named as a party in the assignment of errors. Appellee makes this point, and insists on a dismissal of the appeal. Rule six of this court requires that “the assignment of errors shall contain the full names of all the parties,” and under the settled practice this appeal must be dismissed. Elliott, App. Proc., §323; Ewbank’s Manual, §126.

It is so ordered.

Case Details

Case Name: Haag v. Deter
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 29, 1906
Citation: 167 Ind. 126
Docket Number: No. 20,879
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.