History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haag v. Cuyahoga County
1986 WL 17279
6th Cir.
1986
Check Treatment

798 F.2d 1414

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Haag
v.
CUYAHOGA COUNTY, et al., Defendants-Appellees

No. 85-3633.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

July 29, 1986.

1

Before MILBURN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and DeMASCIO, District Judge.*

ORDER

2

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

3

The Court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the District Court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable Robert E. DeMascio, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Case Details

Case Name: Haag v. Cuyahoga County
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 29, 1986
Citation: 1986 WL 17279
Docket Number: 85-3633
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.