History
  • No items yet
midpage
H v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
0:19-cv-00252
D.S.C.
Feb 3, 2020
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION

CRISSY JYNTENE STEWART, on behalf )

of C.B.H., minor child, )

)

Plaintiff, ) No. 0:19-cv-00252-DCN )

vs. ) ORDER )

ANDREW SAUL, [1] Commissioner of )

Social Security Administration, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

This matter is before the court on United States Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) that this court reverse and remand Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration Andrew Saul’s (“the Commissioner”) decision denying plaintiff C.B.H.’s application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). The Commissioner filed an objection to the R&R. ECF No. 24.

The Commissioner does not object to the recommendation that this case be reversed and remanded; therefore, the court dispenses with a discussion of the substance of this matter. Instead, the Commissioner’s objection is procedural. The R&R concludes by reversing and remanding the Commissioner’s decision and stating that “the court is mindful of the length of this process to date, and therefore recommends that the Commissioner be directed to expedite reconsideration of this matter on remand.” ECF No. 23 at 10. The Commissioner objects to the expedition recommendation, arguing that *2 this case should proceed in due order and consistent with the regulations. The regulations require that a claimant to be served notice of the hearing before the ALJ at least 75 days prior to the hearing. 20 C.F.R. § 404.938(a).

This court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s R&R to which specific, written objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The court agrees with the government that the scheduling of the hearing must comply with the regulations, but the court shares the magistrate judge’s concern regarding additional delay in this matter. Therefore, the court adopts the R&R with the following modification: the case shall be reversed and remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration, and the court directs that an administrative hearing be held in this matter within 120 days of this order.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

DAVID C. NORTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE February 3, 2020

Charleston, South Carolina

2

[1] Andrew Saul is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew Saul is automatically substituted for Nancy A. Berryhill, former Commissioner, as the defendant in this lawsuit. 1

Case Details

Case Name: H v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Court Name: District Court, D. South Carolina
Date Published: Feb 3, 2020
Docket Number: 0:19-cv-00252
Court Abbreviation: D.S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.