History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gwinn v. Washington Post Co.
211 F.2d 641
| D.C. Cir. | 1954
|
Check Treatment

211 F.2d 641

GWINN et al.
v.
WASHINGTON POST CO.

No. 11923.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued February 9, 1954.

Decided February 18, 1954.

Mr. Stanley E. Otto, Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Mr. Gerhard A. Gesell, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Fontaine C. Bradley and Abram J. Chayes, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN and FAHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is a suit for libel. The District Court granted summary judgment for the defendant newspaper. It appears that on a certain day police officers and federal agents set out to execute some thirty-six warrants of arrest. Five persons sought under the warrants were found upon the premises of a restaurant and nightclub owned by the appellants, and the arrests were made there. The arrested persons were taken promptly to the United States Commissioner and held by him under bonds. The Washington Post carried a factual news story of the events. The story, fairly read, contains nothing defamatory of the appellants or of their business. There is evidence in the record that appellants cooperated in the law enforcement move. The judgment of the District Court is

2

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Gwinn v. Washington Post Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Feb 18, 1954
Citation: 211 F.2d 641
Docket Number: 11923_1
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.