History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gwinn v. . Parker
119 N.C. 19
N.C.
1896
Check Treatment

The plaintiff, having previously filed a complaint, on Thursday, Spring Term, 1896, obtained judgment for want of an answer. On the next day the judge, on defendants' affidavit and application, set aside the judgment and allowed defendants 30 days to answer. Plaintiff appealed.

It has been the settled rule for some time that any order or decree made was, during the term, in fieri, and that the Court during the term could vacate or modify the same.

The Court has the discretion also, not reviewable, to extend the time for filing pleadings. Code, sec. 274; Gilchrist v. Kitchin, 86 N.C. 20;Brown v. Hale, 39 N.C. 188.

AFFIRMED.

Cited: Davison v. Land Co., 120 N.C. 260; Woodcock v. Merrimon,122 N.C. 735; S. v. Chesnutt, 126 N.C. 1122; Cook v. Tel. Co.,150 N.C. 429; Gold v. Maxwell, 172 N.C. 150.

(20)

Case Details

Case Name: Gwinn v. . Parker
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 5, 1896
Citation: 119 N.C. 19
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.