155 Pa. 322 | Pa. | 1893
This case appears to have been carefully and correctly tried, and an examination of the record discloses no ground on which a reversal of the judgment would be warranted.
The controlling question was, whether the defendants were partners in the butchering business, managed chiefly by the defendant, Friedly. This question was one of fact exclusively
We find nothing in either of the specifications of error that requires discussion. Neither of them is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.