History
  • No items yet
midpage
Guy v. Furman
4 Misc. 2d 564
N.Y. App. Term.
1956
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This proceeding should have been dismissed for failure to give the notice required by section 53 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations (see Frankel v. Rost, 272 App. Div. 334). But, in any event, such dismissal was surely required upon tenant’s cross motion to set aside the final order in landlord’s favor, when uncontradicted documentary proof was presented that landlord had accepted rent between the time of said notice and the commencement of the proceeding. Subdivision 8 of section 1410 of the Civil Practice Act, authorizing landlord to accept rent without prejudice to a holdover proceeding, applies only after it has been commenced.

The final order and order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, with costs.

Concur: Hofstadter, Eder and Hecht, Jr., JJ.

Final order reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Guy v. Furman
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Jan 12, 1956
Citation: 4 Misc. 2d 564
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.