ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
(Opinion May 8, 1981, 5 Cir. 1981,
Before CHARLES CLARK and GEE, Circuit Judges, and SPEARS, * District Judge.
Both parties petition this Court for a rehearing. Trinity Industries, Inc. raises, for the first time, the Uniform Commercial Code as a bar to recovery of the “time/price differential” of steel awarded to James as damages. Generally, an appellate court does not consider issues that are first presented in an application for rehearing.
See, e. g., United States v. Richards,
Upon review of the opinion, however, the Court, sua sponte, concludes that the award made therein of prejudgment interest on the $102,162.43 amount of liquidated damages is erroneous. The interest period was inadvertently terminated by the district court, and subsequently by this court, as of April 6,1976, the date of settlement (see
Guy James Construction Co. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.,
$102,162.43 at 6% for year 1 = $ 6,129.75
$108,292.17 at 6% for year 2 = 6,497.53
$114,789.70 at 6% for year 3 = 6,887.38
$121,677.08 at 6% for year 4 = 7,300.62
$128,977.70 at 6%'for year 5 = 7,738.66
$136,716.36. at 6% for year 6 = 8,202.98
$144,919.34 at 6% for 77 days = 1,833.39
Total = - $ 44,590.31
Except as modified herein, both petitions for rehearing are DENIED.
Notes
District Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation.
