32 Minn. 70 | Minn. | 1884
That part of the tax judgment objected to in this ease is as follows:
Amount of taxes Penalties and interest before j udgment. Clerk’s fees and advertising. Total amount of judgment.
87 40 30 57
The objection is that the judgment is indefinite, because there is nothing to show whether its amount is any sum of money, or (if any) what sum. We are all of opinion that the amount is sufficiently
These views are not ihconsistent with the opinion of this court in Tidd v. Rines, 26 Minn. 201. On the contrary, one of the grounds upon which the figures by which it was attempted to express the amount of the judgment in that case were held to be insufficient was that there was “no line or decimal mark separating the two right-hand figures in the columns from the rest, as is usually the case.” We do not think it either necessary or wise to go further than that case goes.
Judgment affirmed.
Dickinson, J., because of illness, took no part in this decision.