History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gutierrez v. Ocean Bank
594 So. 2d 827
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1992
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ethyl Corp. v. Balter, 386 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review denied, 392 So.2d 1371 (Fla.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 955, 101 S.Ct. 3099, 69 L.Ed.2d 965 (1981); Nitzberg v. Zalesky, 370 So.2d 389 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Walsh v. Glendale Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 1 Cal.App.3d 578, 81 Cal.Rptr. 804, 811 (Cal.1969) (applying Restatement of Torts § 772 (1939)); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 772 (1979); cf. Scussel v. Balter, 386 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Case Details

Case Name: Gutierrez v. Ocean Bank
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 25, 1992
Citation: 594 So. 2d 827
Docket Number: No. 91-1217
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.