midpage

Guth v. HowardGuth v. Howard

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Sep 27, 1978
78-502
Reporters:
Before:
Grimes, Ryder, Danahy (per curiam)

Walter S. McLin, III of McLin, Burnsed & Cyrus, Leesburg, for appellant.

William F. Brewton of Brewton, Council & Swann, Dade ‍‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‍City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner/appellant seeks to appeal an order which reads “that [respondent‘s] motion to dismiss be and the same is hereby granted.” This is ‍‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‍not a final order within the contemplation of Fla.R.App. P. 9.030(b)(1)(A). Likewise, this is not a nonfinal order which may be reviewed by an interlocutory appeal. Fla.R.App. ‍‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‍P. 9.130(a)(3). Since we have no jurisdiction, the appeal, sua sponte, is dismissed. Arnold v. Brady, 178 So.2d 732 (Fla.2d DCA 1965); Renard v. Kirkeby Hotels, ‍‌​‌​​​​​​​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​​​​​​​​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​‌‌​​​‍99 So.2d 719 (Fla.3d DCA 1958).

GRIMES, C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Guth v. Howard
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 27, 1978
Citations: 362 So. 2d 725; 78-502
Docket Number: 78-502
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In