History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gupp v. Brown
4 U.S. 353
U.S. Cir. Ct.
1805
Check Treatment
By the Court.

— The objection is fatal. The commissioners do not derive their authority from the parties, but from the court ;(b) and as it is a special authority, it must be strictly pursued. The power given to four, cannot be well executed by three commissioners. (c)

The evidence overruled.

Notes

&) Those who execute a commission, are appointed by the court, and although they may be nominated by the parties, they are not their agents. Gilpin v. Consequa, Peters C. C. 88.

If a commission, directed to five commissioners, of whom three are named by the plaintiff’ and two by the defendant, is executed by three only, or by any number less *354than the whole, a deposition taken under it cannot be read, although the two commissioners named by the defendant, by whom the objection is made, were present. The authority of the commissioners is special, and must be executed according to the tenor of it. Armstrong v. Brown, 1 W. C. C. 34. See also Hoofnagle v. Dering, 1 Yeates 302. A joint commission cannot be executed by some of the commissioners, although the others refused to act. Munns v. Dupont, 3 W. C. C. 41. A deposition taken by a commissioner, in conjunction with a person not named in the commission, is not admissible in evidence. Willing v. Consequa, Peters C. C. 309.

Case Details

Case Name: Gupp v. Brown
Court Name: United States Circuit Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1805
Citation: 4 U.S. 353
Court Abbreviation: U.S. Cir. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In