midpage

Gundershein v. Bradley-Mahony Coal Corp.Gundershein v. Bradley-Mahony Coal Corp.

New York Court of Appeals
Jul 23, 1946
Versions:295 N.Y. 539
68 N.E.2d 599
Per Curiam.

The judgment dismissing the prior action brought in behalf of the infant plaintiff was ordered because of failure of diligent prosecution by the guardian ad litem. *541 Since that judgment was not rendered upon the merits, it does not prevent the present action for the same cause of action (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482). Hence the present action, which was commenced within the period of the plaintiff’s infancy, is not barred by the Statute of Limitations (Civ. Prac. Act, § 49, subd. 6; § 60, subds. 1, 3).

The judgments should be reversed and the motions denied, with costs in all courts.

Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thaoher, Dye and Fuld, JJ., concur.

judgments reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Gundershein v. Bradley-Mahony Coal Corp.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 23, 1946
Citations: 295 N.Y. 539; 68 N.E.2d 599
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In