History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gundaker v. Ehrgott
209 Pa. 284
Pa.
1904
Check Treatment
Pee Cueiam,

The questions raised are questions of fact on which we have not been convinced that the court below was in error. The only question that can properly be called one of law was upon the weight of a responsive answer in equity, but as the court found corroborative circumstances in addition to the testimony against the answer we see no error in that respect.

Decree affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Gundaker v. Ehrgott
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 23, 1904
Citation: 209 Pa. 284
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 207
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.