Gundaker v. Ehrgott
209 Pa. 284 | Pa. | 1904
The questions raised are questions of fact on which we have not been convinced that the court below was in error. The only question that can properly be called one of law was upon the weight of a responsive answer in equity, but as the court found corroborative circumstances in addition to the testimony against the answer we see no error in that respect.
Decree affirmed.