106 So. 898 | Ala. | 1926
The petition was under the Workmen's Compensation Act (Gen. Acts 1919, p. 206 et seq.), and compensation was allowed the minor children.
The decree of the lower court awarding compensation for the benefit of the two minor children of appellee is in compliance with the statute, and contained a statement of the law and facts supporting the conclusion and judgment of the court. Gen. Acts 1919, p. 227, § 28. The bill of exceptions in the trial before the court will not be considered (Ex parte Woodward Iron Co.,
The finding of the court denying compensation for the death of the husband to the wife for whose support he was not "in any way" contributing was in accordance with the statute and construction thereof by this court. Such legislative declarations of dependency are not offensive to the provisions of the Constitution. Ex parte Thomas,
The procedure in cases of dispute is prescribed (Gen. Acts 1919, p. 227, § 28; Code 1923, § 7578), and has been followed in the trial court. The decree is specific as to finding *128
of fact and law under which the award was made. Children of the classes indicated by statute are presumed to be dependent. Code 1923, § 7552 et seq.; Ex parte Thomas,
The difference made by the Legislature as to dependency between the wife and children is founded in reason, the result of common observation and experience. A child within the ages indicated by the statute is conclusively presumed to be dependent, as are those over 18 years of age, if physically or mentally incapacitated from earning a livelihood. Code 1923, § 7552; Acts 1919, p. 217, § 14; Ex parte Central C. I. Co.,
A wife is conclusively presumed to be dependent, unless she was: (1) Voluntarily living apart from the husband at the time of his injury or death; (2) not married to decedent at the time of the accident or for a reasonable period prior to his death; or (3) not supported by the husband "in any way contributing" thereto at the time of his death.
The foregoing conditions as to the wife are not imposed by statute upon the children of decedent. Ex parte Thomas, supra; Johnson v. Republic, etc., Co.,
The writ is denied, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Writ denied; judgment affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.