Case Information
*1
Aperl 13,206
Colet of Cormcian Ahems
P.O. Box 12305
Auston, 7A 9811-2305
Re: Wren Mo. H-17857-A
Gene Ciem:
Evcluen is my DStrectors to the Teorl Cauli's Fundus and Concussors nere free such document unnied the above cause.
RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
APR 152015
Abel Acosta, Clerk
*2
WRIT No. 13-17857-A Ex Parte Bruce Andrew Gutliny
In The Court of Cermond Appeals of Texas
i- Introduction
The Appliant Files this "Desjections" and shows that the States proposed FINDINGS of fact and conclusions of law are unsupPORTEd by and contrary to this record claim. The trial court's fact fintions process is Systematically flawed and unconsTituctional, which produced findings of fact that are wibully unrefiable and effective.
ii- Perfections
Applicant is in custom under the 252nd Destrict Court of Jefferson County, Texas but contains that said court Judgment violates the Constitution and laws of the United States.
After a parke revocation rementing on May 3, 2013, Applicant was sent to retson HAVENE NOT YET BEING CONVILTED OF A NEW OFFENSE. NONETRIELES, Applicant suffered two conntictions out of Jefferson County- Burclart on March 13, 2013; and Assault on October 7,2013. Applicant Files this instant wret.
iii- AuthoritIES &; SUPPORT Case Law
In Ex parte Reo, 271 S.W. So 678 (Tex. (eem. 2088), this court of Cermonal APEERLS WELD THAT IT "CHIMS THE STATITORY OUTY TO REVIEN THE TRIAL CULRTS FACtual findings and legal conclusions to ensure that the are supported by the record and are in accordance with the law."-Is. Applicant esps that this court exceesive the desicetion power stated alone
*3 WHEN REVIENDED THIS CLARM THERMWALL. IV-DISICTIONS TO THE TENL COURT'S FOURTHS PROCESS. The APPEEPSITE MOREDUCES WERE NOT EMPLOYED ON APELSTANT DUE PROCESS RELUTS THAT RESUTED IN THIS CONDITION THERMEN THE PAPULE REVOCATION HENRING. SEE WEST GROUND ONE. APELSTANT FURTHER CONTESTED THAT THE JUDMENNT UNDER 15-17851 ARTSING OUT OF JEFFERSON CANNTY, TEXAS 253" COURTEAM VODATIES THE 19" AMENDMENT CONSTITTION PARTI GUNANTEED TO APPELSTANT. THE STATE ARTERNEO PART OF APELSTANT'S ALLEGATION'S IN ITS FENDERIES. "AT THE TIME OF APPELSTANT'S PAPULLE REVOCATION HENRING ON "AMY 3,2013," AND HES RETURN TO TOLT ON "MAY 23,2013" FORMING REVOCATION OF HIS PAPULLE, AS ALLEED UNDER GROUND 1, APPELSTANT HAN NOT YET BEEN CONDITED IN THE UNDERLYTING OFFENSE IN JEFFERSON CANNTY, TENL CAUSE 15-17851." TENL COURT'S FORMING AND LUNGUPPING P.E. J. YET, THE STATE BELENES APPELSTNT IS NOT EXTETED TO RELLEF AND CODE NOT HAVE A ATTACK ADJENT HIS INSTANT OFFENSE. ON THE CONTENAN, APPELSTANT CHALLENGES THIS CONDITION VIA MERMS OF THE OUE PROCESS.
FOR THE REVENUS STATE HEREIN AND FACTS MENTEEN IN APPELSTNT'S WEST APELSTON, IT IS SALKHT THAT THIS COURT CONDUT AN FULL INVESTIATION INTO THE CLARM. IN ORDER TO ARTSING APPELSTNT RELLEF ON THIS EROOK.
SUBMITTED BY, Duncede Hysilary