197 Ala. 233 | Ala. | 1916
We think that the appellant’s brief is sufficient to warrant a consideration of the rulings assigned as error, and complies with the spirit, if not the letter, of the rule. It does not state the facts or history of the case, but there were no facts to state, and but one legal proposition to discuss, which we think is so presented and argued as to inform the court and counsel for appellee as to what the legal proposition is and the argument and authorities in support of same.
The judgment of the city court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.