History
  • No items yet
midpage
Groves v. Groves
177 Ga. 768
Ga.
1933
Check Treatment
IIill, J.

A brief of tlie evidence is essentially a part of a valid motion for new trial. Consequently, where a motion for new trial was filed and no brief of the evidence was presented, the court did not err in dismiss*769ing the motion. Civil Code (1910), §§ 6082, 6306; Baker v. Johnson, 99 Ga. 374 (27 S. E. 706); Mize v. Americus Mfg. &c. Co., 106 Ga. 140 (32 S. E. 22) ; Sewell v. Sewell, 148 Ga. 473 (96 S. E. 1037).

No. 9689. October 12, 1933. William T. Bay and Fred A. Gillen, for plaintiff in error. Wolver M. Smith, Glande Mehaffey, and Jalee B. Joel, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices conowr.

Case Details

Case Name: Groves v. Groves
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 12, 1933
Citation: 177 Ga. 768
Docket Number: No. 9689
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.