midpage

Grossman v. Public Utilities CommissionGrossman v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court
Mar 2, 1966
No. 39436
Versions:
Per Curiam.

This case presents a question of fact. The burden of proof rests upon the complainant. He has failed to produce evidence to establish his claim. The order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Grossman v. Public Utilities Commission
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 2, 1966
Citations: 5 Ohio St. 2d 189; 214 N.E.2d 666; 34 Ohio Op. 2d 347; 1966 Ohio LEXIS 407; No. 39436
Docket Number: No. 39436
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In
    Grossman v. Public Utilities Commission, 5 Ohio St. 2d 189