History
  • No items yet
midpage
Grossman v. Public Utilities Commission
214 N.E.2d 666
Ohio
1966
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

This case presents a question of fact. The burden of proof rests upon the complainant. He has failed to produce evidence to establish his claim. The order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Grossman v. Public Utilities Commission
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 2, 1966
Citation: 214 N.E.2d 666
Docket Number: No. 39436
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.