History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gross v. Wilds
94 S.E. 812
Ga. Ct. App.
1918
Check Treatment
Jenkins, J.

When a defendant against whom a verdict has been rendered makes a motion for a new trial, he can not properly, while the motion is still pending and undisposed of, bring to this court for review any ruling, order, or decision made by the judge during the progress of the case. Kelly & Jones Co. v. Moore, 125 Ga. 382 (54 S. E. 118); Duke v. Story, 113 Ga. 112 (38 S. E. 337); Carreker v. Thornton, 1 Ga. App. 508 (57 S. E. 988). It appearing from the bill of exceptions and the judge’s certificate attached thereto that the plaintiff in error is now seeking to review the ruling of the trial judge in striking the plea in abatement filed by the defendant, and that, upon the court’s subsequently directing a verdict for the plaintiff, a motion for new trial was made, and that at the time the bill of exceptions was certified the motion for a new trial was pending and undisposed of in the court below, the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained.

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Gross v. Wilds
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 22, 1918
Citation: 94 S.E. 812
Docket Number: 8865
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.