History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gross v. Siegman
642 N.Y.S.2d 44
N.Y. App. Div.
1996
Check Treatment

In a proceeding pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 72 to obtain visitation rights, the petitioner Edward Gross appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.), dated June 22, 1995, which granted the motion of the respondents to dismiss that branch of the proceeding which sought visitation rights for the petitioner Edward Gross.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The petitioner Edward Gross is not the biological grandfather of the children with whom he seeks visitation rights and he is not a legal grandparent by virtue of adoption. Accordingly, he is not the children’s grandparent within the meaning of Domestic Relations Law § 72 and has no right thereunder to seek visitation (see, Matter of Hantman v Heller, 213 AD2d 637; Matter of Alison D. v Virginia M., 77 NY2d 651, 656). Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Gross v. Siegman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 29, 1996
Citation: 642 N.Y.S.2d 44
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.