History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gross v. Parrott
16 Cal. 143
Cal.
1860
Check Treatment
Cope, J. delivered the opinion of the Court

Field, C. J. concurring.

The complaint in this case shows that the plaintiff has no cause of action. The undertaking of the defendant was, that Page, Bacon & Co. should pay at the particular times mentioned in the agreement signed by the creditors of that firm. The effect of the subsequent transactions between the plaintiff and Page, Bacon & Co. was to extend the time of payment, and, of course, to release the defendant, who was a mere surety. He was not a party to these transactions, and the plaintiff is not entitled to relief on the ground of inadvertence and mistake. There was no want of knowledge on his part in relation to the facts, and the mistake, if any, was simply a mistake as to the law.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Gross v. Parrott
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1860
Citation: 16 Cal. 143
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.