Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp.

443 Pa. 159 | Pa. | 1971

Opinion

per Curiam,

The jury verdicts in favor of one of four similarly situated plaintiffs and in favor of defendant with respect to the other three plaintiffs, two of whom suffered undisputed property damage, are inconsistent verdiets justifying a new trial as to all. See Thompson v. Iannuzzi, 403 Pa. 329, 169 A. 2d 777 (1961); Pascarella v. Pgh. Rwys. Co., 389 Pa. 8, 131 A. 2d 445 (1957). See also Kessler v. Matlack, 210 Pa. Superior Ct. 450, 233 A. 2d 592 (1967).

Orders granting new trials affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Bell took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Cohen took no part in the decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Gross v. Lockwood Folding Box Corp.

Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date Published: Jun 1, 1971

Citation: 443 Pa. 159

Docket Number: Appeals, Nos. 421 and 422

Court Abbreviation: Pa.