History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
205 N.Y. 617
| NY | 1912
|
Check Treatment

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the amendment of the complaint allowed by the trial court introduced a new and different cause of action, as to which this court concurs in the dissenting opinion of INGRAHAM, P.J., below; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 4, 1912
Citation: 205 N.Y. 617
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.