History
  • No items yet
midpage
Groben v. Edel
273 A.D. 1018
N.Y. App. Div.
1948
Check Treatment

In an action to recover damages for assault, the court awarded plaintiff $6,500, and defendant appeals. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The proof justified a finding that defendant was guilty of a brutal, wanton and unprovoked assault. He offered no proof to controvert plaintiff’s evidence that as a result of such assault plaintiff suffered serious injuries, including a fracture of the skull, and it may not be held that the verdict is excessive. Loss of earnings may be shown under the general allegation of damage and need not be specifically alleged because it is a necessary and direct result of an injury and constitutes a damage which the law implies. (Keiffert v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co., 51 App. Div, 301; Cabot v. McKane, 41 Hun 642, opinion in 1 N. Y. St. Rep. 495; Hubert v. Bedell, 66 Hun 631, opinion in 21 N. Y. S. 305; Mellwitz v. Manhattan Ry. Co., 62 Hun 622, opinion in 17 N. Y. S. 112; 15,Am. Jur., Damages, § 315; 17 C. J., Damages, § 312; 2 Clark, New York Law of Damages, § 773.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Groben v. Edel
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 17, 1948
Citation: 273 A.D. 1018
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.