129 Ala. 454 | Ala. | 1900
The appeal in this case was sued out in the name of all the respondents in the court below. The motion to dismiss the appeal is based upon two grounds, the first 'being that after the rendition of the final decree, appealed from and before the appeal was sued out, Emma Williams, one of the respondents in whose name the appeal was taken, had died. Sufficient to say that this ground of the motion had been met and obviated by a counter motion to amend the appeal so as to show that the same was taken in the name of all the respondents except the said Emma Williams.
'The second ground of the motion is to dismiss for
As no security for costs was given in compliance with the requirements of the statute, it follows that the motion to dismiss the appeal must prevail.
The. appeal is dismissed.