20 So. 2d 54 | Ala. Ct. App. | 1944
This appeal presents the question as to whether or not the petitioner is entitled to bail.
The Bill of Rights, Constitution 1901, Section
The pertaining rule of construction of the foregoing sections of the constitution has so often been determined and declared, we refrain from a repetition here except to say that our Supreme Court has held that the "proof is not evident and the presumption is not great" where from the evidence adduced a well-founded doubt exists as to murder in the first degree (Ex parte Bryant,
Our jurisdiction in this instance is appellate only, and our consideration is therefore confined to the evidence that was before the lower court on the trial of the writ of habeas corpus. We do not deem it wise to discuss this evidence. We need only say that on the evidence before us and under the authorities cited below we are of the opinion that the appellant is entitled to bail. De Arman v. State,
It follows that the order and judgment of the lower court denying the prisoner bail is reversed, and further that the prisoner (petitioner) may be admitted to bail in the sum of five thousand ($5,000) *584 dollars conditioned and approved as the law requires.
Reversed and remanded with instructions.