Grigger v. GoordGrigger v. Goord
—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking review of a determination following a Tier III hearing finding him guilty of violating various inmate rules. We reject the contention of petitioner that he was denied his due process right to an inmate assistant of his choice. “An inmate has no constitutional due process right to the selection of any particular person as his assistant” (.Matter of Scott v Kelly,
There is no support in the record for petitioner’s further contention that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias (see, Matter of Hooper v Goord,