611 So. 2d 20 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1992
This cause is before us on appeal from an order summarily denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although appellant has raised a series of claims, we address only his contention that the trial court erred in summarily denying his claim that he was improperly convicted of two separate conspiracies, when he had entered into only one agreement.
Generally, if a single agreement exists, only one conspiracy, exists, even if the conspiracy has multiple objectives. An