History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gribble v. State
130 Tex. Crim. 152
Tex. Crim. App.
1936
Check Treatment

Conviction for burglary; punishment, nine years in the penitentiary.

The facts in this case are amply sufficient to justify the conclusion of the jury. There are no bills of exception appearing in the record. All matters of procedure upon the trial of this appellant appear to have been regular.

We find in this record evidences of an effort on the part of appellant in vacation to secure her release by habeas corpus, the record concerning which question has no place in the appeal from the result of a trial and conviction of this appellant. The effort of appellant set forth in her habeas corpus papers is fully disposed of by what we have said in our *Page 153 opinion in cause No. 18096, Haile v. State, this day handed down,* in discussing appellant's motion in that case to quash the indictment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

MORROW, P. J., absent.

* (See Haile v. State under date June 24, 1936).

Case Details

Case Name: Gribble v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 1, 1936
Citation: 130 Tex. Crim. 152
Docket Number: No. 18094.
Court Abbreviation: Tex. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.