Gribbel v. Henderson
153 Fla. 397
Fla.1943Check TreatmentLead Opinion
TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
BUFORD, C. J., dissents.
SEBRING, J., not participating.
Dissenting Opinion
On reconsideration of this case, I do not think that the allegations of the bill of complaint are sufficient to show that the defendant-Executors under the Gribbel will are barred from pleading the statute of non-claim. It is my opinion that the plea of non-claim either presented an issue with the burden of proof on the defendant, or else presented a condition requiring amendments to the bill of complaint as replications are no longer available.
So the order striking the plea should be quashed.
