History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gribbel v. Henderson
153 Fla. 397
Fla.
1943
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

ON REHEARING GRANTED
A rehearing having been granted and the Court having heard oral argument and further considered the record and briefs, it is ordered that we now adhere to our former judgment. *Page 398

TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

BUFORD, C. J., dissents.

SEBRING, J., not participating.






Dissenting Opinion

On reconsideration of this case, I do not think that the allegations of the bill of complaint are sufficient to show that the defendant-Executors under the Gribbel will are barred from pleading the statute of non-claim. It is my opinion that the plea of non-claim either presented an issue with the burden of proof on the defendant, or else presented a condition requiring amendments to the bill of complaint as replications are no longer available.

So the order striking the plea should be quashed.

Case Details

Case Name: Gribbel v. Henderson
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Jul 16, 1943
Citation: 153 Fla. 397
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.