History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gregory Reitz v. FCA US LLC
8:20-cv-00687-JLS-JDE
C.D. Cal.
Feb 23, 2021
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 8:20-cv-00687-JLS-JDE Document 30 Filed 02/23/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:465 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. 8:20-cv-00687-JLS-JDE Date: February 23, 2021 Title: Gregory Reitz et al v. FCA US LLC et al

Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Melissa Kunig N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

Not Present Not Present PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: REMAND

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees, currently scheduled for hearing on February 26, 2021. (Mot., Doc. 27.) Plaintiffs, who are California citizens, filed the original complaint in this action in state court, alleging a violation of California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act against Defendant FCA US LLC and Defendant McPeek’s Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram of Anaheim (“McPeek”). (Compl., Doc. 1-2.) Defendants removed on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, asserting that McPeek, a California corporation, was fraudulently joined. (Notice of Removal, Doc. 1.) The parties reached a settlement before Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 11) came before the Court for hearing. Plaintiffs have now moved for an award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to the parties’ agreement. (Doc. 27.)

It appears, however, that the Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on Plaintiffs’ pending motion. The operative complaint alleges no claims under federal law, nor does complete diversity exist, as Plaintiffs and Defendant McPeek are citizens of California. (First Amended Complaint, Doc. 10.) See, e.g., Miller et al v. FCA US LLC et al. , Case No. 8:20-cv-00360-JLS-DFM (Doc. 25, June 29, 2020). Accordingly, Defendants are ORDERED to show cause, in writing, within ten (10) days of the date of this Order , why the Court should not remand this action to state court. Plaintiffs may then file a ______________________________________________________________________________

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL 1 *2 Case 8:20-cv-00687-JLS-JDE Document 30 Filed 02/23/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:466 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. 8:20-cv-00687-JLS-JDE Date: February 23, 2021 Title: Gregory Reitz et al v. FCA US LLC et al

reply within seven (7) days of the date of Plaintiffs’ response. Defendants’ response may not exceed seven (7) pages, and Plaintiffs’ reply may not exceed five (5) pages.

In light of the foregoing, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion is CONTINUED from February 26, 2021 to July 16, 2021 at 10:30 a.m.

Initials of Deputy Clerk: mku ______________________________________________________________________________

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL 2

Case Details

Case Name: Gregory Reitz v. FCA US LLC
Court Name: District Court, C.D. California
Date Published: Feb 23, 2021
Docket Number: 8:20-cv-00687-JLS-JDE
Court Abbreviation: C.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.