History
  • No items yet
midpage
Greenway v. Greenway
1915 Ga. LEXIS 649
Ga.
1915
Check Treatment
Lumpkin, J.

1. From the meager statement of the contents of the record which was admitted in evidence over objection, it can not be held that this ruling was error. When taken in connection with the other evidence, the relevancy of the record thus admitted may be inferred.

2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Greenway v. Greenway
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 18, 1915
Citation: 1915 Ga. LEXIS 649
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.