History
  • No items yet
midpage
Greenman v. Smith
20 Minn. 418
Minn.
1874
Check Treatment

*419 By the Court.

Berry, J.

In a complaint for assault and battery, it is not necessary, as defendant appears to contend, to allege, in so many words, that the acts complained of were committed “ with force,” or “ with force and arms.”

If facts are stated, showing “an actual infliction of violence on the person,” this is sufficient; for such facts constitute a battery, which includes an assault. 2 Greenl. Ev. § 84.

Defendant’s remaining objection to the complaint is equally untenable. The allegation immediately following the statement of the acts of violence complained of, that “ thereby said plaintiff was greatly wounded and bruised,” &c., is a sufficient averment that plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the acts of ’defendant.

Damages being claimed in this case in the sum one thousand dollars, this was not an action within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace. Gen. Stat. chap. 65, § 5, subdiv. 2. The plaintiff was therefore entitled to his costs and disbursements, notwithstanding he recovered only fifty dollars as damages. Gen. Stat. chap. 67, § 2; Laws 1868, chap. 89; Turner vs. Holleran, 8 Minn, 451.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Greenman v. Smith
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Apr 15, 1874
Citation: 20 Minn. 418
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.