History
  • No items yet
midpage
Greenfield v. Steamer Gunnell
6 Cal. 67
Cal.
1856
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

The objection to the want of verification to the declaration should have been made either before answer or with the answer. It comes too late after answer.

See Tooms v. Randall 3 Cal. R., 438.

The other objections should have been taken by demurrer. The declaration, although defective, alleges enough to free it from the charge of not stating facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Greenfield v. Steamer Gunnell
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1856
Citation: 6 Cal. 67
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.