History
  • No items yet
midpage
Greenfield v. Dusseault
33 N.J. 78
| N.J. | 1960
|
Check Treatment
33 N.J. 78 (1960)
161 A.2d 475

JACK GREENFIELD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ROBERT DUSSEAULT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 7, 1960.
Decided June 13, 1960.

Mr. John J. O'Donnell argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Egan, O'Donnell & Hanley, attorneys).

Mr. Sam Weiss argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Jacob Siegal, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Freund in the court below.

BURLING, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Greenfield v. Dusseault
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 13, 1960
Citation: 33 N.J. 78
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.