History
  • No items yet
midpage
Greenfield v. Doepfner
49 Misc. 651
N.Y. App. Term.
1906
Check Treatment
Scott, J.

The evidence that the hall and stairways were insufficiently lighted and that this was the immediate cause of the accident is quite satisfactory. We may not say, as matter of law, that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence because she only steadied herself against the bannister, without actually grasping it (Brown v. Wittner, 43 App. Div. 135), nor should we, in my opinion, so find as matter of fact, in face of the opposite view taken by the trial justice. The damages were very moderate.

I favor affirmance, with costs.

Giegkebich and Gbeehbaum, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Greenfield v. Doepfner
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 1906
Citation: 49 Misc. 651
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.