History
  • No items yet
midpage
Greenberg v. Karnetsky
188 Misc. 674
N.Y. App. Term.
1947
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Memorandum There is nothing, in the record to warrant a finding that the landlord does not intend to use the Office of Price Administration certificate for the purpose for which it was issued. Nor is there any evidence to support the claim that there was a renewal of a prior written lease. The tenant was not a party thereto and she presented no proof tending to show her right to succeed to the interest of the tenant named therein. Acceptance of rent by the landlord after issuance of the certificate and during pendency of the summary proceedings is no bar to their continuance. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1410, subd. 8.)

The final order and judgment should be reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to the landlord, and final order directed in favor of the landlord. Stay of warrant is granted until April Í, 1947.

MacCratb, Steinbrink and Fennelly, JJ., concur.

Order and judgment reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: Greenberg v. Karnetsky
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Feb 27, 1947
Citation: 188 Misc. 674
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.