History
  • No items yet
midpage
Green v. Studen
622 So. 2d 197
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1993
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in entering a temporary injunction without making the findings required under Rule 1.610(c) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and then in denying dissolution thereof without conducting any evidentiary hearing. Upon remand, any orders entered should be in compliance with Rule 1.610(c). See Russo v. Romano, 591 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Allegra Enterprises, Inc. v. Fairchild, 455 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Green v. Studen
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 25, 1993
Citation: 622 So. 2d 197
Docket Number: No. 93-0344
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.