Green v. State, 679 So. 2d 1294

PER CURIAM.

Although we are concerned about the time limitations imposed by the trial court on voir dire examination,¹ appellant did not preserve this issue for appeal, because he affirmatively accepted the jury without renewing his prior objection. Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174, 176 (Fla.1993); Stripling v. State, 664 So.2d 2, 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Notes

1

See O‘Hara v. State, 642 So.2d 592 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Pineda v. State, 571 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Williams v. State, 424 So.2d 148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Case Details

Case Name: Green v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Sep 25, 1996

Citations: 679 So. 2d 1294; 1996 WL 542724; 95-3711

Docket Number: 95-3711

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.