midpage

Green v. MaroulesGreen v. Maroules

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jul 27, 2009
09-1051
Versions:

*1 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Georgia A. Green, Appellant Pro Se. Dal Floyd Wooten, III, Kinston, North Carolina; Kari Russwurm Johnson, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Georgia A. Green appeals from the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Green v. Maroules, No. 4:04-cv-00111-H (E.D.N.C. June 4, 2007; Sept. 2, 2008, Oct. 31, 2008, Nov. 5, 2008, Dec. 1, 2008 & Jan. 5, 2009). We deny Green’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Green v. Maroules
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 27, 2009
Citations: 328 F. App'x 868; 09-1051
Docket Number: 09-1051
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
Log In