History
  • No items yet
midpage
Green v. Ingrassia
244 A.D.2d 554
N.Y. App. Div.
1997
Check Treatment

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, Angelo J. Ingrassia, a Justice of the Supreme Court, to review certain determinations of the Honorable Damian J. Amodeo, a Judge of the Family Court, Dutchess County, in a proceeding entitled Matter of Department of Social Services olblo Sheldon Green v Nadene Green, pending in the Family Court, Dutchess County, and motion by the petitioner for leave to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Green v. Ingrassia
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 24, 1997
Citation: 244 A.D.2d 554
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.