History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gray v. Wright
51 S.E. 373
Ga.
1905
Check Treatment
Candler, J.

1. A consent decree will not be set aside because, “ through accident and mistake,” one of the consenting parties failed to introduce evidence which was in his possession and which might, if submitted on a trial, have resulted in the rendition of a decree different from the one which was taken by consent.

2. It is not error to refuse to entertain a petition to enjoin the cutting of timber on land which, by a decree to which the plaintiff consented, has been legally adjudged to be the property of the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. Wright
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 15, 1905
Citation: 51 S.E. 373
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.