Gray v. . Worthington, 209 N.C. 582

Stacy, C. J.

The nonsuit is correct on two grounds: First, it appears that the alleged parol agreement is in conflict with the written contract to convey (Ins. Co. v. Morehead, ante, 174) ; and, second, the contract to convey is not enforceable as against purchasers for value who hold prior registered title. C. S., 3309; Combes v. Adams, 150 N. C., 64, 63 S. E., 186; Hood, Comr., v. Macclesfield Co., ante, 280.

This is the only question presented by the appeal.

Affirmed.

Devin, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. . Worthington

Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date Published: Feb 26, 1936

Citations: 209 N.C. 582; 183 S.E. 731; 1936 N.C. LEXIS 301

Court Abbreviation: N.C.