History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gray v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
693 F. App'x 230
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jim Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Gerard J. Stief, Associate General Counsel, WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jim Gray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gray v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:16-cv- 01792-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 8, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Gray v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 24, 2017
Citation: 693 F. App'x 230
Docket Number: 17-1299
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.